<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/122">
<title>NOVEMBER 2015 PAST QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/122</link>
<description>NOVEMBER 2015 PAST QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS</description>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/618"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/617"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/616"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/615"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T23:13:54Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/618">
<title>FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING (PAPER 1.1)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/618</link>
<description>FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING (PAPER 1.1)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
The performance of candidates was better compared to the previous sittings. A good number of&#13;
candidates exhibited a high sense of preparedness while others were not well prepared. The&#13;
strength of most candidates was demonstrated in the Income Statement and the Statement of&#13;
Financial Position. Candidates generally scored better in question seven than in the other questions.&#13;
The level of comprehension of candidates in the preparation Income Statement and Statement of&#13;
Financial Position was good.
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The standard of the question paper was good and candidates were asked to answer five (5)&#13;
questions out of seven (7) question. The questions were clear, well typed and the instructions were&#13;
also clearly stated. There were no ambiguities in the paper.&#13;
The mark allocations followed the weight as stated in the syllabus and marks were allocated to&#13;
each sub-questions.&#13;
The questions were evenly spread over the topics in the syllabus. The marking scheme was well&#13;
typed out.
</description>
<dc:date>2015-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
The performance of candidates was better compared to the previous sittings. A good number of&#13;
candidates exhibited a high sense of preparedness while others were not well prepared. The&#13;
strength of most candidates was demonstrated in the Income Statement and the Statement of&#13;
Financial Position. Candidates generally scored better in question seven than in the other questions.&#13;
The level of comprehension of candidates in the preparation Income Statement and Statement of&#13;
Financial Position was good.</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/617">
<title>TAXATION &amp; FISCAL POLICY (PAPER 3.4)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/617</link>
<description>TAXATION &amp; FISCAL POLICY (PAPER 3.4)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS&#13;
NOVEMBER 2015 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS QUESTIONS&#13;
TAXATION AND FISCAL POLICY (3.4)
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS&#13;
NOVEMBER 2015 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS QUESTIONS&#13;
TAXATION AND FISCAL POLICY (3.4)
</description>
<dc:date>2015-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS&#13;
NOVEMBER 2015 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS QUESTIONS&#13;
TAXATION AND FISCAL POLICY (3.4)</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/616">
<title>ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PAPER 3.3)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/616</link>
<description>ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PAPER 3.3)
GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
Being a new syllabus the students are now familiarizing themselves with the distinction between&#13;
the financial management in part 2 and Advanced Financial Management in part 3. In all, the&#13;
performance is not encouraging and is far below our expectations
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, GHANA&#13;
NOVEMBER 2015 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS&#13;
ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT&#13;
EXAMINERS GENERAL COMMEN
</description>
<dc:date>2015-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:description>GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
Being a new syllabus the students are now familiarizing themselves with the distinction between&#13;
the financial management in part 2 and Advanced Financial Management in part 3. In all, the&#13;
performance is not encouraging and is far below our expectations</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/615">
<title>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/615</link>
<description>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA
EXAMINERS GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
The performance in the paper was better than the previous diet, however it fell below expectation considering&#13;
the nature of the questions and the syllabus coverage. It is however, gratifying to note that answers provided&#13;
by candidates reflected individual effort as there was no evidence of copy work among candidates. Overall&#13;
performance in the paper was generally good but could be better.
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The paper met the required standard in terms of clarity, level of difficulty, test of learning outcomes and&#13;
syllabus relevance. The questions ranged from those requiring definitions and explanations to those requiring&#13;
comments, discussion, evaluation and comparing and contrasting
</description>
<dc:date>2015-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINERS GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
The performance in the paper was better than the previous diet, however it fell below expectation considering&#13;
the nature of the questions and the syllabus coverage. It is however, gratifying to note that answers provided&#13;
by candidates reflected individual effort as there was no evidence of copy work among candidates. Overall&#13;
performance in the paper was generally good but could be better.</dc:description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
