<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/83">
<title>MAY 2016 PAST QUESTION AND SOLUTIONS</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/83</link>
<description>MAY 2016 PAST QUESTION AND SOLUTIONS</description>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/590"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/589"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/588"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/587"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T02:08:22Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/590">
<title>TAXATION &amp; FISCAL POLICY (PAPER 3.4)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/590</link>
<description>TAXATION &amp; FISCAL POLICY (PAPER 3.4)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The standard of the paper compared favourably with most of the diets administered in&#13;
the previous sessions. The questions were based on the syllabus and also were within the&#13;
capability of the candidates
GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES&#13;
The general performance of the candidates were above average. One could observe that&#13;
some candidates did not prepare adequately for the exanimation. Some candidates&#13;
seemed not to have properly grasped the basic principles of taxation. Candidates are&#13;
probably engaged in self tuitioning. Some of the candidates performed so poorly and as&#13;
such could be said to be woefully below average. No signs of copying were observed
</description>
<dc:date>2016-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The standard of the paper compared favourably with most of the diets administered in&#13;
the previous sessions. The questions were based on the syllabus and also were within the&#13;
capability of the candidates</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/589">
<title>CORPORATE REPORTING (PAPER 3.1)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/589</link>
<description>CORPORATE REPORTING (PAPER 3.1)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
This paper covered all the topics in the syllabus. The syllabus weightings were fairly&#13;
respected in this diet. The questions were spread well enough to cover all areas of the&#13;
syllabus.
GENERAL PERFORMANCE&#13;
Generally, there was improvement in performance as compared to previous diets.&#13;
However, performance in centres outside Accra was generally poor. ICAG should&#13;
consider providing tuition for students in those locations.&#13;
ICAG should organise orientation sessions for students to make them aware of the&#13;
current nature and trend of corporate reporting requirements. There was no similarity&#13;
of answers to suggest any possible copying.
</description>
<dc:date>2016-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
This paper covered all the topics in the syllabus. The syllabus weightings were fairly&#13;
respected in this diet. The questions were spread well enough to cover all areas of the&#13;
syllabus.</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/588">
<title>ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PAPER 3.3)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/588</link>
<description>ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PAPER 3.3)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
MAY 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION&#13;
ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (3.3)&#13;
QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME
MAY 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION&#13;
ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (3.3)&#13;
QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME
</description>
<dc:date>2016-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>MAY 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION&#13;
ADVANCED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (3.3)&#13;
QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME</dc:description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/587">
<title>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/587</link>
<description>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The questions were featured from all the nine sections of the syllabus. The marks&#13;
allocation was also done strictly in accordance with the syllabus weighting as reflected&#13;
in the chart below.&#13;
SECTIONS OF SYLLABUS COVERAGE AND WEIGHTING&#13;
SECTIONS A B C D E F G H I TOTAL&#13;
SYLLABUS&#13;
WEIGHTING&#13;
(%)&#13;
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100&#13;
MARKS&#13;
ALLOTED&#13;
TO&#13;
QUESTIONS&#13;
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100&#13;
The solutions were very detailed and responded adequately to the requirements of the&#13;
questions. The marking scheme was structured fairly to the advantage of candidates
PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES&#13;
Performance in the paper fell far below expectation. Candidates demonstrated that they&#13;
did not prepare adequately and therefore lacked required knowledge to answer the&#13;
questions correctly. Answers provided did not respond to the requirements of the&#13;
questions. While many candidates wrote ‘auditing’, they did not answer the questions.&#13;
However, the approach to the questions, the style of writing and use of language&#13;
indicated that candidates did individual work and there was no sign of copy work&#13;
among candidates.
</description>
<dc:date>2016-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINER’S REPORT&#13;
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The questions were featured from all the nine sections of the syllabus. The marks&#13;
allocation was also done strictly in accordance with the syllabus weighting as reflected&#13;
in the chart below.&#13;
SECTIONS OF SYLLABUS COVERAGE AND WEIGHTING&#13;
SECTIONS A B C D E F G H I TOTAL&#13;
SYLLABUS&#13;
WEIGHTING&#13;
(%)&#13;
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100&#13;
MARKS&#13;
ALLOTED&#13;
TO&#13;
QUESTIONS&#13;
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100&#13;
The solutions were very detailed and responded adequately to the requirements of the&#13;
questions. The marking scheme was structured fairly to the advantage of candidates</dc:description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
