<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>MAY 2020 PAST QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/324</link>
<description>MAY 2020 PASCO</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 05:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:35Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>ADVANCED TAXATION (PAPER 3.3)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/520</link>
<description>ADVANCED TAXATION (PAPER 3.3)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
The Advanced Taxation Paper is final level paper (Professional) which is supposed to&#13;
ensure that candidates develop knowledge and skill set in tax administration and&#13;
practice and also ability to apply knowledge to practical issues to achieve benefit for&#13;
their entities.&#13;
The level of difficulty of the paper was appropriate for the final level standard and&#13;
candidates who sat for the examination would attest to that fact. The spread of the&#13;
questions along the syllabus was quite impressive and appeared to reward hard work,&#13;
scholarship and intensive research. A candidate who concentrated on only a limited&#13;
area of the syllabus, was sure to have some challenges with the paper. In fairness, the&#13;
paper was quite good and appropriate for the final level and of high standard.&#13;
One noticeable feature is that most candidates did not give a lot of examples in their&#13;
solutions. It must be noted that examples help bring out concepts which are not&#13;
properly explained. Candidates are therefore encouraged to use examples where&#13;
relevant to elucidate the points being made in their solutions so as to maximize marks.&#13;
On the whole, the Institute must be commended for maintaining high standards and&#13;
integrity over the years in terms of the tax paper.
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The questions administered as always assumed the usual characteristics known at the&#13;
final level in line with the syllabus content. The marks allocated to each question were&#13;
good and appropriate for the volume required. The spread of the questions covered&#13;
the entire syllabus and were of a high standard akin to any final level taxation paper&#13;
at any professional level.&#13;
Some of the questions required practical application which was in order and what the&#13;
paper sought to achieve. The additional good part of the paper was that it required&#13;
report writing which was good for a final level paper. This would help cure paucity&#13;
of writing by candidates and prepare them for the future job market. The paper tested&#13;
the knowledge, skill and application of the candidates. Some of the candidates gave&#13;
good account of themselves while others continued to struggle and showed poor&#13;
academic strength.&#13;
The only little low point about the paper was the fact that it did not test much of&#13;
applications as previous diets did. The questions were more of the recall type and&#13;
ended up punishing candidates who did not read much and dwelled on technicalities&#13;
and picking issues out of narratives. The question four which was examination of&#13;
accounts should have tested, additionally, the rationale for the treatment of certain&#13;
transactions in a particular way by candidates as a further prove that candidates were&#13;
on top of the issues, just so the Institute is sure their candidates were practicallyPage 2 of 23&#13;
oriented materials ready to face the job market in the future with dexterity. This,&#13;
however, did not take away the fact that on the whole standard of the paper was high.&#13;
The clarity of the question was also quite impressive and worth commenting. There&#13;
was no ambiguity that really came up in any of the questions. The paper quality was&#13;
good and the type setting was also impressive and made reading interesting and&#13;
rewarding. The paper was more importantly, free from material error and conveyed&#13;
the thoughts of the examiners which came out quite well judging from the responses&#13;
of candidates who prepared well for the paper in their solutions.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/520</guid>
<dc:date>2020-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
The Advanced Taxation Paper is final level paper (Professional) which is supposed to&#13;
ensure that candidates develop knowledge and skill set in tax administration and&#13;
practice and also ability to apply knowledge to practical issues to achieve benefit for&#13;
their entities.&#13;
The level of difficulty of the paper was appropriate for the final level standard and&#13;
candidates who sat for the examination would attest to that fact. The spread of the&#13;
questions along the syllabus was quite impressive and appeared to reward hard work,&#13;
scholarship and intensive research. A candidate who concentrated on only a limited&#13;
area of the syllabus, was sure to have some challenges with the paper. In fairness, the&#13;
paper was quite good and appropriate for the final level and of high standard.&#13;
One noticeable feature is that most candidates did not give a lot of examples in their&#13;
solutions. It must be noted that examples help bring out concepts which are not&#13;
properly explained. Candidates are therefore encouraged to use examples where&#13;
relevant to elucidate the points being made in their solutions so as to maximize marks.&#13;
On the whole, the Institute must be commended for maintaining high standards and&#13;
integrity over the years in terms of the tax paper.</dc:description>
</item>
<item>
<title>STRATEGIC CASE STUDY (PAPER 3.4)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/519</link>
<description>STRATEGIC CASE STUDY (PAPER 3.4)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
GENERAL COMMENTS AND STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The standard of the paper was good and the questions were clear. The coverage was&#13;
broad. The paper was a slight improvement over the maiden paper which was done&#13;
in November 2019. Marks allocation followed the weightings in the syllabus and was&#13;
fairly allocated to each sub-question.
PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES&#13;
The overall performance was average. Most candidates did well in Section A of the&#13;
paper which was based on the pre-seen portion of the case study. Most of the&#13;
candidates performed poorly in Section B which contributed to the overall low&#13;
percentage pass rate in the paper.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/519</guid>
<dc:date>2020-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>GENERAL COMMENTS AND STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The standard of the paper was good and the questions were clear. The coverage was&#13;
broad. The paper was a slight improvement over the maiden paper which was done&#13;
in November 2019. Marks allocation followed the weightings in the syllabus and was&#13;
fairly allocated to each sub-question.</dc:description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518</link>
<description>ADVANCED AUDIT &amp; ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The paper covered all sections of the syllabus. However, section C of the syllabus&#13;
covered 39%instead of 25%. This resulted in section D of the syllabus covering 11%&#13;
instead of 25%. The level of difficulty of the questions was reasonable.
PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES&#13;
The performance with regards to pass rate in this paper was 57.45% while that of&#13;
November 2019 was 66.52%. Answers provided represented the efforts of the&#13;
individual candidates. The general performance was encouraging. In certain cases it&#13;
appeared that candidates did not take their time to understand the requirements of&#13;
the question, resulting in candidates providing answers to certain questions that&#13;
completely deviated from the requirement. Some candidates did not take their time to&#13;
write, making reading difficult for markers.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518</guid>
<dc:date>2020-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The paper covered all sections of the syllabus. However, section C of the syllabus&#13;
covered 39%instead of 25%. This resulted in section D of the syllabus covering 11%&#13;
instead of 25%. The level of difficulty of the questions was reasonable.</dc:description>
</item>
<item>
<title>PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION (PAPER 2.6)</title>
<link>http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/517</link>
<description>PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION (PAPER 2.6)
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
The candidates’ performance in this paper was very good and encouraging as more&#13;
than 45% of the candidates who wrote the paper passed. The candidates have now&#13;
been learning the subject based on the law and principles. Previous diets indicated&#13;
that candidates were learning with questions instead of principles of taxation. There&#13;
were clear general understanding of the questions and more also the questions&#13;
included instructions to candidates that were specific and clear. Most of the candidates&#13;
performed excellently probably because the instructions and requirements in the&#13;
questions were clear enough. Fortunately, this is the second diet for the paper and&#13;
candidates would have the opportunity to make amends by learning the rudiments of&#13;
the paper. Candidates are advised, however, to read more on the tax laws. This is so&#13;
because the Principles of Taxation is built on general knowledge on how the law&#13;
works and more importantly how the law is explained and applied.
STANDARD OF THE PAPER&#13;
The questions were excellent for part two. All the questions did reflect the Principles&#13;
of Taxation syllabus of which the candidates were expected to have a fair knowledge&#13;
to pass. The questions fairly covered the entire syllabus and the expectations were that&#13;
any average student who wrote the paper should pass.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/517</guid>
<dc:date>2020-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG</dc:creator>
<dc:description>EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS&#13;
The candidates’ performance in this paper was very good and encouraging as more&#13;
than 45% of the candidates who wrote the paper passed. The candidates have now&#13;
been learning the subject based on the law and principles. Previous diets indicated&#13;
that candidates were learning with questions instead of principles of taxation. There&#13;
were clear general understanding of the questions and more also the questions&#13;
included instructions to candidates that were specific and clear. Most of the candidates&#13;
performed excellently probably because the instructions and requirements in the&#13;
questions were clear enough. Fortunately, this is the second diet for the paper and&#13;
candidates would have the opportunity to make amends by learning the rudiments of&#13;
the paper. Candidates are advised, however, to read more on the tax laws. This is so&#13;
because the Principles of Taxation is built on general knowledge on how the law&#13;
works and more importantly how the law is explained and applied.</dc:description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
