dc.contributor.author |
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-20T10:22:25Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-20T10:22:25Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019-05 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/468 |
|
dc.description |
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of the paper continues to be very high and very comparative with the
previously examined papers at this level. There were no ambiguities/ errors/typing
problems that adversely affected performance in the examinations.
The marks allocation followed the weightings in the syllabus except that some of the
syllabus coverages were merged. In my opinion some of the questions were fairly
loaded, especially questions one (1), two (2), three (3) and four (4). Also some of the
marks allocated were ‘over-generous’. For example, question two (2(a) (ii)) should
attract at least five (5) marks and not the ten (10) marks that was allocated. Marks
allocated to question three (3b) was too much. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS
Candidates performed averagely in this paper having a pass rate of 57.32%. It
however, fell short of that of the previous diet’s pass rate of over 68%.Candidates
strangely performed poorly in questions three (3), four (4) and five (5). The worse
performance was in question five (5) which only 25% passed.
Lecturers and students are encouraged to look critically at all the topics that featured
in those three questions since they will continue to be examined by examiners. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ICAG LIBRARY |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
AA;PAPER 2.3 |
|
dc.subject |
MAY 2019 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS AUDIT & ASSURANCE (PAPER 2.3) CHIEF EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA |
en_US |
dc.title |
AUDIT & ASSURANCE (PAPER 2.3) |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
AA PAPER 2.3 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Learning Object |
en_US |