dc.contributor.author |
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-20T15:56:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-20T15:56:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-11 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/487 |
|
dc.description |
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of the questions was excellent for level two of the examination structure.
All the questions did reflect the Principles of Taxation syllabus of which the
candidates were expected to have a fair knowledge to pass. The questions fairly
covered the entire syllabus and the expectations were that any average student who
wrote the paper should be in the position to pass.
Question one assessed the candidates on The Ghanaian Tax Systems, Fiscal Policy and
Tax Administration and Tax Assessment. Candidates were examined on topics such
as: functions of the Board of GRA and that of the Commissioner General of GRA,
functions of the District Assembly Common Fund, computation of interest on overdue
tax liability, and tax returns. These questions were supposed to be familiar to
candidates because Fiscal Policy and Tax Administration are explicitly stated in the
Principles of Taxation syllabus. The marks allocated were also fair for the efforts
needed to answer the question.
Question two examined candidates on Value Added Tax. The questions were
straightforward dealing with basic principles governing VAT. Some of the questions
were: examples of taxable activities, VAT implication of instalment payments, and
implications of agents and principals. Consistently for the past three sittings, the
candidates’ performance have been poor, probably because most of the candidates
have not grasped the laws and principles governing the VAT withholding
mechanisms.
Question three tested candidates understanding on Taxation of Partnerships,
Individuals and the principles governing Residents and Non-resident persons. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS
The candidates’ performance in this paper was good but not what was expected based
on the standard of the questions. Approximately 20% of the candidates who wrote the
paper passed. This was below May 2020 of which approximately 37% of the
candidates passed. The encouraging news is that the candidates have now been
learning the subject based on the law and principles as indicated in the syllabus and
also alluded to by the Chief Examiner in the May 2020 diet. Previous diets indicated
that candidates were learning with questions instead of principles of taxation. There
were clear general understanding of the questions and more also the questions
included instructions to candidates that were specific and clear. Most of the candidates
performed excellently probably because the instructions and requirements in the
questions were clear enough.
This is the third diet for the paper after the change of the syllabus and candidates
would have the opportunity to make amends by learning the rudiments of the paper.
Candidates are advised, however, to read and pay attention more on the tax laws and
principles. This is so because the Principles of Taxation is built on general knowledge
on how the tax laws and principles are to work and more significantly how the law
and principles are to be explained and applied. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ICAG LIBRARY |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
PT;PAPER 2.6 |
|
dc.subject |
NOVEMBER 2020 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION (PAPER 2.6) CHIEF EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA |
en_US |
dc.title |
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION (PAPER 2.6) |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
PT PAPER 2.6 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Learning Object |
en_US |