Abstract:
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of this paper was comparable in many respects to previously
administered ones. The questions were standard for this level of examination. The
marks allocations followed the weightings in the course syllabus. For all questions and
sub-questions, the marks allocations were fairly done in line with course syllabus.
Generally, the questions were clear in their requirements. The marking scheme made
provision for alternate presentation where necessary. The questions were spread well
enough to cover all areas of the syllabus. The amount of work (the relevant workings
and the final answer) required by questions was commensurate with the allotted time
and marks of this paper. There were no typos, errors, and ambiguities throughout the
questions within the paper.
Description:
PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES
The performance in this diet was average. This could be attributed to lack of adequate
preparation by many candidates for the paper. Performance of candidates at various
centres around the country differed significantly. Candidates did so well in some
centres and at the same time candidates did so poorly in some centres too. This
imbalance of candidates’ performances across centres affected the general
performance in the paper. There was no evidence to suggest any possible copying in
the examination.