STANDARD OF THE PAPER The standard of the paper was good. It compares favourably with those of previous sittings. There were no ambiguities, typographical or other errors in the paper. The marks allocation was fair and marks were allocated to each sub-question. All the questions were within the scope of the syllabus. PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES The performance was slightly above average. There was no significant improvement in the candidate’s performance. Some of the candidates performed poorly because it was evident from their scripts that they did not prepare very well for the examination.

NOVEMBER 2017 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6) CHIEF EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME