Abstract:
EXAMINER’S REPORT
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of the paper was good. It compares favourably with those of November,
2015. Candidates were required to attempt the case question and any other three
questions. There were no ambiguities, typographical or other errors in the paper. The
marks allocation was fair and marks were allocated to each sub-question. All the
questions were within the scope of the syllabus.
Description:
PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES
Overall, the performance of candidates in the May 2016 was slightly better. However, a
good number of the candidates performed poorly because they did not prepare very
well for the examination. Part of the reason for the poor performances may be due to
the policy that allow candidates to write across levels.
STRENGTHS OF CANDIDATES
The main strength was that almost all the candidates attempted the required number of
questions.