CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6)

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG

dc.contributor.author	INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-25T13:47:53Z
dc.date.available	2022-07-25T13:47:53Z
dc.date.issued	2016-05
dc.identifier.uri	http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/582
dc.description	PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES Overall, the performance of candidates in the May 2016 was slightly better. However, a good number of the candidates performed poorly because they did not prepare very well for the examination. Part of the reason for the poor performances may be due to the policy that allow candidates to write across levels. STRENGTHS OF CANDIDATES The main strength was that almost all the candidates attempted the required number of questions.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	EXAMINER’S REPORT STANDARD OF THE PAPER The standard of the paper was good. It compares favourably with those of November, 2015. Candidates were required to attempt the case question and any other three questions. There were no ambiguities, typographical or other errors in the paper. The marks allocation was fair and marks were allocated to each sub-question. All the questions were within the scope of the syllabus.	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	ICAG	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	ICAG LIBRARY	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	CSEG;PAPER 2.6
dc.subject	MAY 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (2.6) EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA	en_US
dc.title	CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6)	en_US
dc.title.alternative	CSEG PAPER2.6	en_US
dc.type	Learning Object	en_US