dc.contributor.author |
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-25T14:02:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-25T14:02:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-05 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/587 |
|
dc.description |
PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES
Performance in the paper fell far below expectation. Candidates demonstrated that they
did not prepare adequately and therefore lacked required knowledge to answer the
questions correctly. Answers provided did not respond to the requirements of the
questions. While many candidates wrote ‘auditing’, they did not answer the questions.
However, the approach to the questions, the style of writing and use of language
indicated that candidates did individual work and there was no sign of copy work
among candidates. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
EXAMINER’S REPORT
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The questions were featured from all the nine sections of the syllabus. The marks
allocation was also done strictly in accordance with the syllabus weighting as reflected
in the chart below.
SECTIONS OF SYLLABUS COVERAGE AND WEIGHTING
SECTIONS A B C D E F G H I TOTAL
SYLLABUS
WEIGHTING
(%)
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100
MARKS
ALLOTED
TO
QUESTIONS
10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 100
The solutions were very detailed and responded adequately to the requirements of the
questions. The marking scheme was structured fairly to the advantage of candidates |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ICAG LIBRARY |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
AAA;PAPER 3.2 |
|
dc.subject |
MAY 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION ADVANCED AUDIT & ASSURANCE (3.2) EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS AND MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA |
en_US |
dc.title |
ADVANCED AUDIT & ASSURANCE (PAPER 3.2) |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
AAA PAPER 3.2 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Learning Object |
en_US |