dc.contributor.author |
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-25T14:31:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-25T14:31:52Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-11 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/591 |
|
dc.description |
GENERAL PERFOMANCE
The general performance still falls below expectations even though one gets few
outstanding candidates. The main reason for this is that some candidates come into the
examination hall unprepared. Apart from that, it appears that some candidates do not
take their time to read over the questions to appreciate the requirements from the
questions.
One other issue is that some candidates do not relate their answers to the marks
allocation. For instance if the allocation of marks gives (4 marks) to a particular question
this implies that the candidate is only required to give a short answer instead of writing
copiously. By so doing a candidate will be able to make time to answer other questions
that may require detailed analysis. If candidates would take their time to read through
the whole questions, they would be able to allocate their time properly for each question.
Turning to the strengths and weakness it is difficult to state that high performance or low
performance is concentrated in a particular center. Because in each pack you would get
cases of high performance and low performance but the bottom line is the level of
preparedness of the candidates, I believe that if candidates learn in syndicates, this will
benefit them in future. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
EXAMINER’S GENERAL COMMENTS
The standard of the paper compared favorably with previously administered ones. There
were no serious ambiguities typing or typographical errors. All the questions were of
required standard. They were also fairly spread across the syllabus thus any candidate
who decides to confine himself to a particular area had himself to blame. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ICAG LIBRARY |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
BCL;PAPER 1.3 |
|
dc.subject |
NOVEMBER 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS BUSINESS & CORPORATE LAW (PAPER 1.3) CHIEF EXAMINERS REPORT, QUESTIONS & MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA |
en_US |
dc.title |
BUSINESS & CORPORATE LAW (PAPER 1.3) |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
BCL PAPER 1.3 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Learning Object |
en_US |