Abstract:
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of the paper was good. It compares favourably with those of May, 2016.
Candidates were required to attempt the case question and any other three questions.
There were no ambiguities, typographical or other errors in the paper. The marks
allocation was fair and marks were allocated to each sub-question. All the questions
were within the scope of the syllabus.
Description:
PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES
Overall, the performance of candidates in the November 2016 examination was low. A
good number of the candidates performed poorly because they did not prepare very
well for the examination. Part of the reason for the poor performances may be due to
the policy that allow candidates to write across levels