CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6)

dc.contributor.author	INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-25T14:42:18Z
dc.date.available	2022-07-25T14:42:18Z
dc.date.issued	2016-11
dc.identifier.uri	http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/596
dc.description	PERFORMANCE OF THE CANDIDATES Overall, the performance of candidates in the November 2016 examination was low. A good number of the candidates performed poorly because they did not prepare very well for the examination. Part of the reason for the poor performances may be due to the policy that allow candidates to write across levels	en_US
dc.description.abstract	STANDARD OF THE PAPER The standard of the paper was good. It compares favourably with those of May, 2016. Candidates were required to attempt the case question and any other three questions. There were no ambiguities, typographical or other errors in the paper. The marks allocation was fair and marks were allocated to each sub-question. All the questions were within the scope of the syllabus.	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	ICAG	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	ICAG LIBRARY	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	CSEG;PAPER 2.6
dc.subject	NOVEMBER 2016 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATIONS CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6) CHIEF EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS & MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA	en_US
dc.title	CORPORATE STRATEGY, ETHICS & GOVERNANCE (PAPER 2.6)	en_US
dc.title.alternative	CSEG PAPER2.6	en_US
dc.type	Learning Object	en_US