Description:
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
Performance at this diet was not encouraging on account of lack of understanding of
fundamental finance issues on the part of the candidates. It appeared most candidates
were not prepared for the exams, especially those candidates in level two who “cut
across” the AFM in level three. Poor handwriting from some candidates was very difficult
to read and mark. Poor grammatical expressions leading to poor construction of
sentences.
Most students struggled with Q5 (particularly the part on futures). Moreover, it appeared
students do not take the theory and conceptual aspect of the paper serious. Preparations
on the exams appeared to be lacking.
