dc.contributor.author |
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT GHANA, ICAG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-10-17T09:08:26Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-10-17T09:08:26Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-08 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://41.66.247.10:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/626 |
|
dc.description |
PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES
As compared to the April 2022 diet, which recorded a 77% score above the pass mark
of 50%, the August 2022 diet recorded a 66% score above the 50% pass mark.
The August diet saw a deteriorating performance over the April 2022 session. This
may be attributed to the fact that the time lapse between the two diets was not long
enough. Tuition providers should now encourage candidates to grasp the new ICAG
act.
Question 4b) was a high scoring question because it is practical and popular. Question
4 aii) was however mixed because candidates found it a bit tricky. Performance in
Question 3, by candidates was below expectation even though it was a straight
forward question. Many candidates mixed up their understanding for the content of
management representation letter with that of management letter (letter of weakness) |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
STANDARD OF THE PAPER
The standard of the paper was good. The questions were practical and within the
syllabus in terms of structure and weightings. The paper was free from errors. The
rubrics of the paper were very clear without ambiguities. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ICAG |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
AA;PAPER 2.3 |
|
dc.subject |
AUGUST 2022 PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION AUDIT & ASSURANCE (PAPER 2.3) CHIEF EXAMINER’S REPORT, QUESTIONS & MARKING SCHEME ICAG LIBRARY NYARKO TWUM OSBORN ERNEST YAW DENKYIRA |
en_US |
dc.title |
AUDIT & ASSURANCE (PAPER 2.3) |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
AA PAPER 2.3 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Learning Object |
en_US |